Piggy Falls Victim to a Malicious Act

In William Golding’s iconic novel, Lord of the Flies, the descent into savagery and the loss of civilization are explored through the actions of a group of stranded boys. As tensions rise and power struggles ensue, a heartbreaking event occurs – the death of Piggy. In this article, we aim to shed light on the circumstances surrounding Piggy’s demise, with a particular focus on the individual responsible for this tragic act.

Among the boys stranded on the island, Roger stands out as a character whose cruelty and sadistic tendencies progressively emerge. As the story unfolds, Roger’s actions become increasingly malicious, revealing a disturbing thirst for power and violence. It is within this context that Piggy’s fate becomes entwined with Roger’s sinister intentions.

The pivotal moment leading to Piggy’s untimely demise occurs when Roger dislodges a massive boulder, intentionally causing it to plummet towards Piggy. This deliberate act of violence leaves no room for doubt – it was a premeditated murder driven by malice. Roger’s intention to kill is evident through his lack of warning or attempt to prevent the fatal impact.

The motive behind Piggy’s murder was rooted in the desire to exert dominance and instill fear within the group. Piggy, with his rationality and commitment to reason, posed a threat to the escalating savagery that had engulfed the boys. By eliminating Piggy, Roger sought to eliminate a voice of sanity, ensuring the unchecked reign of chaos.

While it is true that Sam and Eric were present during this tragic event, their involvement cannot be equated with Roger’s culpability. Though they may have been prisoners of Jack’s group, they did not actively partake in Piggy’s murder. Their presence, however, highlights the extent of the corruption that had infected the once-civilized society.

In analyzing the events leading up to Piggy’s demise, it becomes clear that Roger bears full responsibility for his actions. His unwavering thirst for blood and his willingness to carry out acts of violence distinguish him as the primary agent of Piggy’s death. The absence of remorse or any attempt to conceal his intentions further solidifies his role as the catalyst for this tragic event.

The death of Piggy in Lord of the Flies is a stark reminder of the darkness that can reside within humanity. As Roger’s malicious actions escalate, culminating in the intentional killing of Piggy, the consequences of unchecked savagery become painfully evident. The responsibility for Piggy’s demise falls solely on Roger, whose thirst for power and bloodshed ultimately shatters the fragile remnants of civilization. The haunting question that lingers is whether such acts of cruelty are inherent within us all, waiting to be unleashed under the right circumstances.

Why Did Piggy Get Killed?

Piggy gets killed in the story because Roger, who has been demonstrating increasingly cruel tendencies, intentionally dislodges a boulder that ultimately leads to Piggy’s death. This event takes place after Ralph and Piggy make attempts to establish peace and cooperation with Jack’s group.

1. Roger’s cruel tendencies: Throughout the story, Roger’s character evolves to become more sadistic and brutal. He finds pleasure in tormenting and inflicting pain on others, as seen in his actions towards the weaker members of the group.

2. Overtures of peace and cooperation: Ralph and Piggy, realizing the importance of unity and order, attempt to establish a peaceful resolution with Jack’s group. They recognize that working together is crucial for their survival on the deserted island.

3. Roger’s desire to kill: As the tension and conflicts escalate, Roger becomes increasingly eager to unleash his violent tendencies. He wants to exert dominance and control over others by taking someone’s life. His desire to kill intensifies, and both Ralph and Piggy become potential targets.

4. Dislodging the boulder: Roger finally seizes an opportunity to satisfy his bloodlust when he dislodges a massive boulder from the cliff. He purposely aims it towards Ralph, but Piggy, who is standing in the path of the boulder, is unable to avoid its deadly trajectory.

5. Piggy’s unfortunate fate: Tragically, Piggy, who symbolizes reason, intelligence, and civilization on the island, becomes an unintended victim of Roger’s deadly actions. The impact of the boulder kills him instantly, symbolizing the destruction of rationality and order in the face of escalating violence and chaos.

Piggy’s death occurs due to Roger’s sadistic desires and his deliberate act of dislodging a boulder. This event serves as a turning point in the story, illustrating the triumph of brutality over reason and marking a significant loss for the group’s chances of survival.

Piggy Lord of the Flies 1694609355

Who Killed Piggy And Simon?

Piggy and Simon were killed by different individuals in the novel “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding. Piggy was killed by Roger, while Simon’s death was the result of a brutal attack by a group of boys.

1. Piggy’s death:
– Piggy, one of the main characters in the story, was killed by Roger, a member of the group of boys stranded on the island.
– Roger deliberately pushes a large rock down a hill, which strikes Piggy and causes him to fall to his death.
– This act of violence reflects the growing savagery and loss of civilization among the boys as they descend into chaos and anarchy.

2. Simon’s death:
– Simon, another significant character, is killed during a chaotic and frenzied moment on the island.
– After witnessing a terrifying and hallucinatory encounter with the “Lord of the Flies,” Simon tries to inform the other boys about the true nature of the beast.
– However, due to a combination of fear, confusion, and mob mentality, the boys mistake Simon for the beast and brutally attack him.
– The boys, driven by their primal instincts and frenzied state, beat Simon to death with their bare hands and makeshift weapons.

It is important to note that both Piggy and Simon’s deaths symbolize the loss of reason, morality, and civilization within the boys’ society. Their deaths mark significant turning points in the narrative, highlighting the destructive power of fear and the dark side of human nature when left unchecked.

Was Piggy’s Death An Accident?

Piggy’s death in the novel “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding was not an accident. It was a deliberate act of violence committed by Roger, one of the boys stranded on the island.

In the story, Roger intentionally pushes a large boulder off a cliff, aiming to hit Piggy who was standing below. The boulder strikes Piggy, causing him to fall to his death. This action clearly demonstrates Roger’s malicious intent to harm or kill Piggy.

Furthermore, prior to Piggy’s death, the boys on the island had descended into a state of savagery and chaos. They formed tribes and engaged in acts of violence, which created a hostile environment where such an act could occur.

Moreover, Piggy’s death cannot be considered an accident because there was no element of chance or unforeseen circumstances involved. Roger deliberately chose to throw the boulder, knowing full well the potential consequences of his action.

Piggy’s death in “Lord of the Flies” was not accidental but a deliberate act of murder committed by Roger. The malicious intent, premeditation, and absence of chance all contribute to the conclusion that it was not an accident.

Is Jack Responsible For Piggy’s Death?

According to the events in William Golding’s novel “Lord of the Flies,” Jack can be held responsible for Piggy’s death. Here are the reasons why:

1. Failure to prevent the boulder incident: When Roger releases the boulder that ultimately kills Piggy, Jack does not intervene or call out to warn Piggy. This lack of action shows his disregard for the safety and well-being of others.

2. Lack of leadership and order: Throughout the story, Jack becomes increasingly obsessed with hunting and the pursuit of power. As a result, he allows chaos and violence to dominate the group, creating an environment where such tragic events can occur.

3. Encouraging aggression and violence: Jack’s hunger for power fuels the aggressive behavior of his followers. He instigates fear and encourages his tribe to engage in violent acts, which ultimately leads to Piggy’s demise.

4. Ignoring Piggy’s value: Despite Piggy’s intelligence and rationality, Jack consistently dismisses and belittles him. By devaluing Piggy, Jack indirectly contributes to the group’s eventual disregard for his safety.

5. Manipulating the group dynamics: Jack manipulates the boys’ fear and desire for safety to gain control over them. He exploits their vulnerability and uses it to further his own agenda, which ultimately results in the tragic consequences for Piggy.

Jack’s actions and lack of responsibility contribute significantly to Piggy’s death. His obsession with power, promotion of violence, and disregard for the safety of others ultimately lead to the tragic event.

Jack Piggy Lord of the Flies 1694609391


The tragic death of Piggy in William Golding’s novel “Lord of the Flies” is the result of Roger’s deliberate and malicious actions. Roger’s cruel tendencies and thirst for blood are evident throughout the story, and his ultimate desire to kill someone leads him to dislodge a boulder that kills Piggy. This act of violence is not accidental but a deliberate act of murder, as Roger had clear intentions and no remorse for his actions. His lack of warning or attempt to save Piggy further emphasizes his responsibility for the death. The motive for Piggy’s killing, along with the absence of any accidental or unforeseen circumstances, solidifies the argument that it was a calculated murder. Ralph’s statement that Roger is fully responsible for the actions leading up to Piggy’s death holds true, as it is clear that his cruel nature and intentions directly caused the tragic outcome.

Photo of author

William Armstrong

William Armstrong is a senior editor with H-O-M-E.org, where he writes on a wide variety of topics. He has also worked as a radio reporter and holds a degree from Moody College of Communication. William was born in Denton, TX and currently resides in Austin.