Based on the video footage that captured the incident involving Harambe and the child at the Cincinnati Zoo, it is possible to interpret Harambe’s behavior as an attempt to protect the boy rather than harm him. This perspective was shared by renowned primatologist Jane Goodall, who suggested that Harambe’s actions seemed to be protective rather than aggressive.
However, it is important to note that interpreting animal behavior is not always straightforward, and it is essential to consider multiple factors and perspectives. The video itself does not provide a complete understanding of the situation, as it captures only a limited perspective and does not show the entire sequence of events leading up to the incident.
In a longer explanation provided during an interview with the president of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, Jane Goodall concluded that the zoo had no choice but to kill Harambe. This suggests that while Harambe’s intentions may have been protective, the potential danger posed by his size and strength to the child necessitated immediate action to ensure the child’s safety.
It is important to remember that Harambe was a gorilla, a species known for their physical strength and power. Even in situations where an animal’s intentions may seem benign, their actions can inadvertently cause harm due to their sheer size and strength. In this particular case, the zoo officials had to prioritize the safety and well-being of the child, making the difficult decision to euthanize Harambe.
While it is tempting to anthropomorphize animals and attribute human-like emotions and intentions to their behavior, it is crucial to approach such interpretations with caution. Animals, including gorillas like Harambe, have their own complex set of instincts, behaviors, and social structures that may not align with our human understanding.
While the video may suggest Harambe’s attempt to protect the child, it is important to consider the broader context and the safety concerns involved in making the decision to euthanize Harambe. The zoo officials had to prioritize the well-being of the child, given the potential danger posed by Harambe’s size and strength. Interpreting animal behavior is a complex task, and it is essential to rely on the expertise of professionals who can make informed decisions based on the best interest of both humans and animals involved.