There are living relatives of Laura Ingalls Wilder, although none of them are her direct descendants. Laura Ingalls Wilder, the beloved author of the “Little House on the Prairie” series, had a family of her own, but unfortunately, not many of her descendants survived into adulthood.
Laura and her husband Almanzo Wilder had two children, a daughter named Rose and a son named Charles Frederick. However, Charles Frederick died at the age of nine months, so he did not have any children or descendants of his own.
Rose, on the other hand, did have a son named Roger Lea MacBride. However, he also faced a tragic fate as he did not survive past infancy. Therefore, Laura Ingalls Wilder does not have any direct descendants.
Despite this, there are still living relatives of Laura Ingalls Wilder through her extended family. Laura had siblings, such as her sister Mary Ingalls, who married and had children of their own. These nieces and nephews of Laura Ingalls Wilder are the closest living relatives to her.
One of Laura’s nieces was named Cora Belle Ingalls, who had a daughter named Eloise. Eloise had a son named Richard, who is considered a living relative of Laura Ingalls Wilder. Richard and his family are proud to be connected to the famous author and carry on the legacy of the Ingalls family.
Additionally, there may be other distant relatives of Laura Ingalls Wilder who are connected through more extended family lines. Family trees can often branch out in numerous directions, and it is possible that there are other living descendants of Laura’s siblings or other relatives.
While Laura Ingalls Wilder does not have any direct descendants, there are still living relatives connected to her through her extended family. These relatives carry on the family name and continue to celebrate the legacy of Laura Ingalls Wilder and her beloved “Little House on the Prairie” books.