In my opinion, VK (formerly known as Vkontakte) can be considered safer than Facebook due to a few reasons. Firstly, VK is approved by web security companies, which means that it has passed certain security checks and measures to protect its users’ data. This approval gives users some assurance that their personal information is being handled in a secure manner.
Unlike Facebook, VK does not ask for passport data during the registration process. This can be seen as a positive aspect as providing such sensitive information can increase the risk of identity theft or fraud. Many users appreciate the fact that VK does not require this level of personal information, as it helps maintain their privacy and security online.
Additionally, VK users often mention that it is easier to restore their accounts if they have been hacked compared to Facebook. This can be a crucial factor for users who value the ability to quickly regain control of their accounts and protect their personal information.
It’s important to note that no social media platform is completely immune to security threats and breaches. However, VK’s efforts to pass security checks and its simplified account recovery process can contribute to a perception of increased safety compared to Facebook.
While VK may not be perfect, it appears to have some advantages in terms of security when compared to Facebook. However, it’s crucial for users to still be cautious and take necessary precautions to ensure their own online safety, regardless of the platform they choose to use.
To summarize, VK can be considered safer than Facebook based on the approval by web security companies, the absence of passport data requirements, and the perceived ease of account restoration in case of hacking incidents. However, it is important for users to remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their personal information and online security.