Why is ASL not taught in schools?

Answered by Tom Adger

There are several reasons why American Sign Language (ASL) is not commonly taught in schools. These reasons can vary depending on the specific educational system and cultural context, but I will try to provide a comprehensive explanation.

1. Limited perceived usefulness: One of the main reasons ASL is not taught in schools is the perception that it has limited practical applications. Many people view sign language as only relevant for the deaf and hard of hearing community, and therefore not essential for the general population to learn. This perspective overlooks the fact that sign language can benefit individuals who have communication difficulties, such as those with speech impairments or certain learning disabilities. However, this limited perception of usefulness often leads schools to prioritize other subjects in their curriculum.

2. Curriculum constraints: Schools face numerous challenges in designing their curriculum, and fitting in another subject can be difficult. With limited time and resources, educational institutions often prioritize core subjects such as mathematics, science, and language arts. Adding ASL as a separate subject would require allocating time and resources, which can be seen as burdensome by administrators and teachers. As a result, schools may be resistant to incorporating ASL into their curriculum, especially if they perceive it as less important than other subjects.

3. Lack of qualified instructors: Teaching ASL requires specialized knowledge and skills that many educators may not possess. Schools may struggle to find qualified instructors who are fluent in ASL and have experience teaching the language effectively. Without well-trained teachers, it becomes challenging to provide quality ASL instruction, which can further discourage schools from offering it as a subject.

4. Limited awareness and understanding: There is still a lack of general awareness and understanding about sign languages, including ASL. Many people perceive sign languages as mere gestures or a simplified form of communication, rather than recognizing their linguistic complexity and cultural significance. This lack of awareness can contribute to the undervaluing of sign languages, including ASL, and further perpetuate the notion that they are not worth teaching in schools.

5. Cultural biases and discrimination: Historically, sign languages have often been stigmatized and marginalized in favor of spoken languages. This can be attributed to audism, which is the belief that hearing and spoken language are superior to deafness and sign languages. Such biases can influence educational policies and attitudes, leading to the exclusion of sign languages from school curricula. Overcoming these cultural biases and promoting inclusivity is crucial for recognizing the importance of ASL as a language and providing equal educational opportunities for all students.

The limited inclusion of ASL in school curricula can be attributed to various factors, including the perceived limited usefulness, curriculum constraints, lack of qualified instructors, limited awareness, and cultural biases. Overcoming these challenges requires a shift in attitudes, increased awareness, and recognition of the linguistic and cultural value of sign languages like ASL.