The U.S. Congress Began with The Great Compromise

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, played a crucial role in the formation of the American government. It was an agreement reached among the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, and it established the structure of Congress that we still have today.

One of the main points of contention during the convention was how representation in Congress should be determined. Some delegates believed that each state should have an equal number of representatives, while others argued for representation based on population. The Great Compromise was the solution that ultimately satisfied both sides.

Under the Great Compromise, Congress would consist of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. In the Senate, each state would be represented by two senators, regardless of its population. This satisfied the smaller states, as it ensured equal representation for all states.

On the other hand, the House of Representatives would be apportioned based on population. Each state would have a number of representatives determined by its population, with larger states having more representatives than smaller states. This satisfied the larger states, as it gave them more influence in the legislative process.

The accurate statement about the Great Compromise is that it established a system where one house of Congress, the Senate, would have equal representation for all states, while the other house, the House of Representatives, would have representation based on population. This compromise struck a delicate balance between the interests of the larger and smaller states, and it remains a fundamental aspect of our government today.

It is important to note that the Great Compromise was not without controversy. The issue of slavery, in particular, was a major point of contention. The compromise did not directly address the issue of slavery, but it did have implications for how enslaved populations were counted for representation in the House of Representatives.

This brings us to another significant compromise known as the Three-Fifths Compromise. This agreement determined that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining a state’s population and thus its representation in the House of Representatives. Contrary to the statement provided, the Three-Fifths Compromise did not determine where the greatest enslaved populations were based on census data. Instead, it dealt with the contentious issue of how to count enslaved individuals for representation.

The Great Compromise was a vital agreement that shaped the structure of our government. By establishing a bicameral legislature, with one house based on equal representation and the other based on population, it successfully addressed the concerns of both larger and smaller states. While the compromise did not directly address the issue of slavery, it had implications for the representation of enslaved populations. The accurate statement about the Great Compromise is that it suggested a legislature composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate, with representation determined by population in one house and equal representation for all states in the other.

Which Of The Following Statements Is The Most Accurate Description Of The Great Connecticut Compromise?

The most accurate description of the Great (or Connecticut) Compromise is that it established a bicameral legislature with a combination of proportional representation and equal representation for the states. This compromise was reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when the delegates were debating how to structure the legislative branch of the new government.

The Great Compromise resolved the conflict between the large states, who wanted representation to be based on population, and the small states, who feared being overshadowed by the larger states. The compromise proposed that the legislative branch would consist of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate.

In the House of Representatives, representation would be based on population. Each state would be allocated a certain number of representatives based on the size of its population. This satisfied the large states’ desire for proportional representation.

In the Senate, however, each state would have an equal number of senators, regardless of population. This satisfied the small states’ desire for equal representation. Each state would have two senators, ensuring that smaller states would have an equal voice in the legislative process.

The Great Compromise struck a balance between the interests of the large and small states, and it played a crucial role in securing the approval of the Constitution by the states. It remains a fundamental aspect of the structure of the United States Congress to this day.

congress 1694234684

What Was The Great Compromise?

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was an agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States. It was a pivotal moment in the formation of the American government, as it resolved the contentious issue of representation in Congress.

The Great Compromise aimed to balance the interests of both large and small states. Prior to this agreement, there were differing opinions on how representation should be allocated in the legislative branch. Larger states argued that representation should be based on population, while smaller states insisted on equal representation for all states.

To address these concerns, the Great Compromise proposed a bicameral legislature, consisting of two separate houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Here’s how the compromise was structured:

1. The Senate: Each state, regardless of its size or population, would have an equal number of senators. This ensured that the smaller states would have an equal say in the legislative process. Each state would be represented by two senators, a provision that still exists today.

2. The House of Representatives: Representation in the House would be based on population. The larger states would have more representatives, reflecting their higher population count. This satisfied the concerns of the larger states, as they would have more influence in the legislative process.

The Great Compromise struck a delicate balance between the competing interests of large and small states. It allowed for fair representation while preventing the domination of one group over the other. The compromise laid the foundation for the structure of Congress, which remains in place today.

The Great Compromise was an agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention that established a bicameral legislature in the United States. It ensured that each state had equal representation in the Senate, while representation in the House of Representatives was based on population.

Which Of The Following Statements About The Three-Fifths Compromise Is Accurate?

The Three-Fifths Compromise, which was a key agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, determined the method for counting enslaved individuals when determining a state’s population. However, it did not specifically determine where the largest populations of enslaved people were located based on census data. Instead, the compromise established that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining a state’s representation in the House of Representatives and the allocation of taxes. This compromise was a result of the disagreement between Northern and Southern states regarding the inclusion of enslaved individuals in the population count. The compromise aimed to balance the political power between the North and the South, as the Southern states had a larger enslaved population. Ultimately, the Three-Fifths Compromise perpetuated the institution of slavery and had significant implications for representation and taxation in the United States.

What Is Most Characteristic Of The Great Compromise Of The Constitution Quizlet?

The most characteristic aspect of the Great Compromise of the Constitution is the establishment of a bicameral legislature. This compromise proposed the creation of two separate chambers within the legislative branch: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This arrangement aimed to address the concerns and interests of both small and large states, ensuring a fair representation and balance of power.

The House of Representatives would be based on proportional representation, meaning that the number of seats each state would have is determined by its population. This satisfied the larger states, as they would have more influence and representation in this chamber.

On the other hand, the Senate would provide equal representation for each state, regardless of its size or population. Each state would have two senators, ensuring that smaller states would have a voice and influence in the legislative process. This arrangement appeased the smaller states, as it protected their interests and prevented domination by larger states.

The Great Compromise struck a delicate balance between the interests of both small and large states, ensuring a fair and effective legislative system. This compromise remains a fundamental characteristic of the United States’ constitutional structure and continues to shape the functioning of the American government.

congress 1694234690

Conclusion

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, played a crucial role in shaping the structure of the American government. It was an agreement reached by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which aimed to address the issue of representation in Congress.

The compromise proposed a bicameral legislature, consisting of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. In the Senate, each state would have an equal representation with two senators, ensuring that smaller states would have an equal voice in the legislative process. On the other hand, the House of Representatives would be apportioned based on population, giving larger states more representatives and thus more influence.

This compromise struck a delicate balance between the interests of smaller and larger states, ensuring that their concerns were taken into account. It was a significant breakthrough in the negotiations and helped to secure the support of both sides, leading to the eventual ratification of the Constitution.

The Great Compromise not only addressed the issue of representation but also demonstrated the spirit of compromise and cooperation that was necessary for the success of the Constitutional Convention. It set a precedent for future negotiations and paved the way for the development of a strong and unified federal government.

The Great Compromise was a pivotal moment in American history, shaping the structure of the government and ensuring fair representation for both small and large states. It exemplified the importance of compromise in the political process and laid the foundation for a strong and enduring union.

Photo of author

William Armstrong

William Armstrong is a senior editor with H-O-M-E.org, where he writes on a wide variety of topics. He has also worked as a radio reporter and holds a degree from Moody College of Communication. William was born in Denton, TX and currently resides in Austin.