Which is better Saxon Math vs Abeka?

Answered by Willie Powers

When it comes to comparing Saxon Math and Abeka Math, it is important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each program. Both programs have their own unique approach to teaching math, and what works best for one student may not work as well for another.

Saxon Math is known for its incremental approach, which means that new concepts are introduced gradually and built upon previous knowledge. This can be beneficial for students who thrive on repetition and practice, as there is a heavy emphasis on review and reinforcement of previous concepts. The program also provides ample opportunity for problem-solving and critical thinking, helping students to develop a deeper understanding of mathematical principles. Additionally, Saxon Math aligns closely with the Common Core Standards, making it a popular choice for schools and districts that follow this curriculum framework.

On the other hand, Abeka Math takes a more traditional approach to math instruction, with a focus on memorization and drill. The program aims to cultivate math fluency through frequent practice and repetition. Abeka Math tends to introduce concepts earlier and at a quicker pace compared to Saxon Math and the Common Core. This can be advantageous for students who are quick learners or who have a solid foundation in math. However, it may also present challenges for students who require more time and support to grasp new concepts.

In terms of curriculum content, both Saxon Math and Abeka Math cover the essential topics in math, including number sense, operations, geometry, measurement, and algebra. However, the sequencing and pacing of these topics may vary between the two programs. Saxon Math typically introduces new concepts in a specific order, building upon previously learned skills, while Abeka Math may introduce topics in a different sequence.

Ultimately, the choice between Saxon Math and Abeka Math depends on the individual needs and learning style of the student. Some students may thrive in a more structured and repetitive environment, while others may benefit from a more conceptual and problem-solving approach. It is important for parents and educators to carefully consider the strengths and weaknesses of each program and choose the one that best fits the needs of their students. Personal experiences and feedback from other users can also provide valuable insights in making an informed decision.