A married groomsmen is often referred to as a groom’s person. This term is inclusive and recognizes that individuals of any gender can serve as an attendant to the groom. It acknowledges that traditional gender roles are not the only option when it comes to wedding parties.
The term “groom’s person” is a more modern and inclusive alternative to the traditional terms of groomsmen, groomsmaid, or groomswoman. It reflects the changing dynamics of weddings and the desire to be more inclusive and open-minded in our language and traditions.
In some military weddings, the term “swordsmen” is used instead of groomsmen. This term is specific to military weddings and reflects the ceremonial aspect of such occasions. It highlights the military background of the groom or the groomsmen and adds a unique touch to the wedding party.
It is important to note that the specific terminology used may vary depending on cultural traditions, personal preferences, and the couple’s desires. Some couples may choose to use the term “bridesman” or “bride’s man” to refer to a male attendant on the bride’s side, while others may simply refer to all attendants as “wedding party members” or “attendants” to avoid any gender-specific titles.
Ultimately, the terminology used to refer to a married groomsmen is a personal choice made by the couple and should reflect their values and beliefs. It is essential to be respectful and understanding of the couple’s choices and to embrace the diversity and inclusivity that is increasingly becoming a part of modern weddings.