How do you separate an abstract from an introduction?

Answered by Antonio Sutton

To separate an abstract from an introduction, it is essential to understand their distinct purposes and structures within a research paper or article. Both sections serve different functions and are positioned differently within the overall document.

1. Purpose:
The abstract aims to provide a concise summary of the entire study, highlighting the main objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. It offers readers a quick overview of the research without delving into excessive details. In contrast, the introduction sets the stage for the study by providing background information, establishing the problem or research question, and outlining the significance and scope of the research.

2. Placement:
The abstract typically appears at the beginning of the paper, immediately after the title and author information. It serves as a standalone section that can be read independently from the rest of the article. On the other hand, the introduction is positioned after the abstract and presents the first substantive content of the paper. It introduces the topic to the reader and connects it to existing knowledge.

3. Content:
The abstract should be concise and focused, usually ranging from 150 to 250 words. It should contain a brief statement of the research problem, the methodology employed, the main findings, and the implications or significance of the results. It should avoid references to specific figures, tables, or citations. The abstract must accurately represent the entire study, providing enough information to understand its purpose and outcomes.

In contrast, the introduction provides a broader context for the research. It begins with a general background that introduces the topic and highlights the gaps or issues that the study aims to address. The introduction gradually narrows down to a specific research question or hypothesis, explaining its importance and potential contributions to the field. It may also include a brief overview of the methodology and anticipated outcomes, but specific results are typically not presented in detail in this section.

4. Tone and Style:
The abstract should be written in a concise and objective manner, focusing on essential information and avoiding excessive use of adjectives or personal anecdotes. It should be structured logically, briefly summarizing each key aspect of the study. In contrast, the introduction allows for a more narrative style, providing a logical flow of information and including relevant references to establish the research context.

The abstract and introduction have distinct purposes, positions, and contents within a research paper. While the abstract provides a concise summary of the entire study, the introduction sets the stage for the research by providing background information and highlighting the research problem. Being aware of these differences helps ensure that these sections are appropriately separated and fulfill their respective roles in a scholarly article.