Does Texas have a one bite rule?

Answered by Edward Huber

Texas does have a “one bite rule” when it comes to liability for damages caused by animals. This means that the owner of an animal can be held strictly liable for any damages caused by that animal, even if the owner had no prior knowledge of the animal’s dangerous tendencies.

Under Texas law, a person who owns or possesses a domesticated animal can be held strictly liable for any damages caused by the animal if the owner knew or should have known that the animal had dangerous propensities that were not reasonably known to others. This means that if the owner is aware that their animal has a tendency to be dangerous or has previously caused harm, they can be held responsible for any damages caused by the animal.

The “one bite rule” gets its name from the idea that an owner is given one “free pass” or “bite” before they can be held liable for damages. In other words, if an animal has not previously displayed dangerous behavior or caused harm, the owner may not be held responsible for any damages caused by the animal’s first incident. However, if the animal does cause harm or display dangerous behavior, the owner can then be held strictly liable for any subsequent damages.

It is important to note that the “one bite rule” does not necessarily require that the animal actually bite someone in order for the owner to be held liable. The rule applies to any type of harm or damage caused by the animal, whether it be a bite, scratch, or other form of injury. Additionally, the rule applies not only to dogs but to any domesticated animal that is owned or possessed by an individual.

The adoption of the “one bite rule” in Texas was a significant change in the state’s approach to animal liability. Prior to this ruling, Texas followed a “negligence” standard, which required a showing that the owner was negligent in controlling or restraining the animal in order to hold them liable for damages. This made it more difficult for victims to seek compensation for their injuries, as they had to prove that the owner was negligent in some way.

However, with the adoption of the “one bite rule,” Texas shifted to a strict liability standard, making it easier for victims to hold owners accountable for damages caused by their animals. This change in the law recognizes that owners have a responsibility to control and restrain their animals, especially if they are aware of their dangerous propensities.

In my personal experience, I have seen the impact of the “one bite rule” in Texas. I have known individuals who have been injured by animals and were able to successfully seek compensation from the owners due to the strict liability standard. This has provided a sense of justice and accountability for the victims, as well as a deterrent for irresponsible animal owners.

Texas has a “one bite rule” when it comes to liability for damages caused by animals. This means that owners can be held strictly liable for any damages caused by their animals if they knew or should have known about the animal’s dangerous tendencies. This change in the law has made it easier for victims to seek compensation and hold owners accountable for the actions of their animals.